• 300 S. Firestone Street, Suite 200-C Gastonia, NC 28052
  • 400 E. King Street, Kings Mountain, NC 28086

Author Archives: Thrasher NC

Essential Concrete Strength Testing Methods

Concrete is a critical structural element, and its strength directly impacts a building’s safety. But how do we ensure it meets the demands placed upon it? Concrete strength testing ensures a concrete mix meets design specifications for its intended load-bearing capacity, to ensure the structure’s stability and prevent potential failures.

Concrete strength is most commonly measured by testing its compressive strength, which measures its ability to withstand forces pushing it inwards and together. This article reviews methods for testing concrete strength, both in the controlled environment of a lab and on-site in the field. We’ll also explore preparation methods used for the concrete test specimens and other concrete tests indirectly related to strength.


Q: What units are used when concrete compressive strength is measured?


Concrete being strength tested in a lab

Lab Testing: Strength Testing & Related Tests During Planning and Pre-Construction

Lab testing a calculation of concrete strength under controlled conditions. It is typically used for initial mix design and strength evaluation during planning and pre-construction or to help with batching quality control.

Note: While lab samples can be useful, they might not exactly replicate the actual curing conditions on the construction site. Enter the need for field testing for verifying in-situ strength, which will be discussed later in this article.

Lab Concrete Strength Cylinder Test (ASTM C39): This lab test measures a concrete cylinder’s ability to withstand a compressive load until failure and is the primary method used by engineers for determining concrete strength. Cylinders are cast from the fresh concrete mix and cured under controlled temperature and humidity conditions which mimic the actual construction site environment. After a specified period (usually 7 or 28 days), the cylinders are crushed in a hydraulic press. This machine applies a compressive force on the ends of the cylinder, gradually increasing the pressure, until the cylinder cracks or breaks.

The maximum load it can bear is then recorded. The load is divided by the cylinder’s cross-sectional area to obtain the compressive strength. This compressive strength value becomes a benchmark for the concrete’s overall strength.

The desired compressive strength will depend on the intended use for the concrete. Sidewalk and driveway projects, for example, may require a lower psi than commercial buildings and warehouses.

Field cylinders may also undergo the ASTM C39 test (see: Making and Curing Test Specimens (ASTM C31) below for more detail). Field cylinders evaluate the concrete’s actual strength “in-situ” within the structure, while lab cylinders assess the mix design’s potential under controlled conditions.

Unbonded Capping of Concrete Cylinders (ASTM C1231):

In concrete strength testing, unbonded capping is an alternative method for preparing the ends of cylindrical concrete specimens so that they are flat. For an accurate test, the top and bottom faces of the cylinder must be perpendicular to its axis. Uneven load-bearing surfaces can introduce errors in the test results.

Unbonded capping uses a flexible pad, typically neoprene or rubber, instead of a bonded capping material like sulfur mortar or neat cement paste. The pad is placed on each end of the concrete cylinder and steel retainer rings hold the pads securely in place to create a smooth, flat surface.

Unbonded caps are quicker to apply and remove (vs. grinding or cutting uneven ends or bonded capping) for faster preparation of specimens before each test The pads may be reused up to 100 times, reducing waste and cost (vs. single-use bonded caps).

However, unbonded capping cannot be used in every case. ASTM C1231 outlines limitations for using unbonded caps. They are generally not suitable for very low (below 10 MPa or 1500 psi) or very high strength (above 80 MPa or 12000 psi) concrete. Unbonded caps are suitable for concrete with minor imperfections on the ends, up to 5 mm (around 3/16 inches). For larger deviations, grinding or cutting the cylinder ends might be necessary before testing.

Field Testing: Assessing In-Situ Strength

While lab testing provides valuable insights for planning and pre-construction, construction also requires assessing the strength of concrete after it has been poured and cured on-site in actual field conditions. Field testing is key for investigating potential concrete strength issues in existing structures – especially when quick confirmation of adequate strength is needed for construction progress.

Below are a few key strength-related concrete field testing methods and processes:

Slump Test (ASTM C143): The Slump Test is a quick test that measures the consistency and workability of fresh (unhardened) cement concrete, which impacts its compaction and ultimately, its strength. Concrete with a higher slump may be easier to place but can lead to trapped air and reduced strength. The Slump Test is a valuable tool for concrete quality control in the field, ensuring the correct consistency (not too wet or too dry) and cohesion (the ingredients are holding together well).

To conduct the Slump Test, a cone-shaped mold is filled with concrete in layers and rodded to remove air bubbles. The mold is lifted straight up, and the slump is the distance that the center of the concrete settles. This indicates how easily the concrete will flow and fill forms, with a moderate slump (between 1/2 inch and 9 inches) being ideal for most applications.

Sampling of Freshly Mixed Concrete (ASTM C172): Obtaining a representative sample of fresh concrete ensures accurate concrete strength testing. Following ASTM C172 ensures a well-mixed composite sample that accurately reflects the overall properties of the concrete batch for reliable strength testing. Samples are taken from the middle portion of the concrete batch, avoiding the first and last portions that may not be well mixed.

For portable drum mixers and mixer trucks, sampling occurs during discharge, when a container is inserted into the stream, or the concrete flow is diverted into a container during discharge. For paving mixers, samples are collected from five locations after the entire contents of the paving mixer are discharged onto the ground where the concrete will be placed.

Regardless of the mixer type, it’s crucial to collect the sample within the specified timeframe (usually 15 minutes after obtaining the first portion) to ensure the properties haven’t changed significantly.

Making and Curing Test Specimens (ASTM C31): ASTM C31 outlines the process for making and curing cylindrical or beam-shaped concrete test specimens in the field. Fresh concrete is obtained following ASTM C172 and placed in molds in layers. Each layer is rodded to eliminate air bubbles, and the top is smoothed. The molds are covered to prevent moisture loss and kept at a specific temperature range for an initial curing period. Then, the specimens are demolded and submerged in water or a limewater solution for final curing until testing, typically at 28 days. This ensures the concrete reaches a controlled and standardized strength for accurate compressive strength test results.

Temperature of Concrete (ASTM C1064): ASTM C1064 is a standard test method for determining the temperature of freshly mixed concrete at the time of placement. It outlines how to measure the temperature using a specific type of thermometer that can be inserted into the concrete. The field concrete test ensures the concrete is within a proper temperature range (typically between 30°F and 120°F or 0°C and 50°C). This is important for concrete strength because extreme temperatures can affect the setting time, workability, and thus, the ultimate strength of the concrete.

Unit Weight (ASTM C138): ASTM C138 is a test method to determine the unit weight (also sometimes referred to as density) of fresh concrete. Unit weight is important for estimating yield of concrete from a mix design (knowing the unit weight allows engineers to calculate the actual volume of the resulting concrete from the ingredients) and quality control (unit weight variations can indicate potential issues with the mix proportions, mixing process or presence of air bubbles).

The test involves filling a specific mold with the fresh concrete and compacting it according to the standard. The weight of the filled mold is then measured, and dividing this weight by the known volume of the mold gives the unit weight of the concrete.

This test has an indirect relationship to concrete strength. Higher unit weight typically indicates a denser concrete mix with fewer air pockets, which usually means a higher strength. However, it’s not a standalone measure of strength. For example, a concrete mix with a higher unit weight due to the amount of heavy aggregate might not necessarily be stronger than a mix with a lower unit weight that has a more optional mix design.

Air Content by  Pressure Method (ASTM C231): The Air Content by Pressure Method test measures the volume of air entrapped within the concrete mix and is used for concrete made with relatively dense aggregate particles, excluding internal air voids within the aggregates themselves. The pressure method test uses a special apparatus called an air meter, which is filled with a concrete sample and water. The air meter bucket rim is cleaned and the top section is placed, after which sealed water is introduced through one of either petcocks until all air bubbles dissipate, then the petcocks are closed. Air pressure is applied, and the change in volume of the trapped air is measured. Maintaining the desired air content is crucial for ensuring concrete durability, workability, and achieving the target strength. Too little air can lead to freeze-thaw damage, while too much air can reduce strength.

Air Content by Volumetric Method (ASTM C173): The Air Content by  Volumetric Method outlined in ASTM C173 is a test to measure the air trapped within fresh concrete. This test helps ensure the concrete has the proper amount of air for workability and freeze-thaw resistance. Its value lies in its ability to accurately measure air content in concrete where the air content by pressure method might struggle, such as lightweight concrete and those with highly porous aggregates. Generally, higher air content leads to lower strength, however it is not a direct measure of concrete strength.

For this test, concrete is placed in the meter bucket in two layers, rodded and sides tapped for each layer. The bucket rim is cleaned, and the graduated neck is placed on the bucket and clamped for a tight seal. The funnel is then placed in the neck and a small amount of water is added before introducing 2 pt of 70% isopropyl alcohol, then the remaining water is added up to the 0 mark. Then the top is added and sealed into place.

The meter is then shaken and rolled to release air bubbles. The water level in the neck rises due to the displaced air, and this change in level indicates the air content as a percentage of the total concrete volume. This test helps ensure the concrete has the proper amount of air for workability and freeze-thaw resistance.

Ready to begin testing?

By employing a combination of these tests, engineers gain a comprehensive understanding of concrete’s properties, ensuring a safe and structurally sound construction project. Need concrete strength testing services or other concrete construction materials testing?  Contact The Thrasher Group NC about our AASHTO and CCRL accredited test lab and services.


Past to Present: Building Legacy at the Heart of Gaston County

The Thrasher Group North Carolina’s Gastonia office is located in what historically was known as the Loray Mill, and later Firestone Cotton Mill. Loray Mill — also nicknamed “Million Dollar Mill” — was one of the largest textile facilities in the South. The building continues it’s legacy of making Gaston County an economic hub still to this day.

At its peak in the early 1900s, Loray Mill employed over 750 workers and was a technological and structural powerhouse. Tying in architectural and structural engineering from New England, Loray Mill’s facilities were equipped with firewall partitions and fire doors to the interior to limit the spread of fire, all while maintaining aesthetic Italianate details with arched windows and a pyramidal roof on the exterior of the building. Further, the mill stood apart in the South because of its experimental steam power source and air conditioning systems.

The mill closed its doors in 1993, and while it no longer produces textiles, the mill still presents itself as an impressionable space for the community. With modernized housing and office spaces, including Thrasher NC, the mill provides the Gaston community with a collaborative space for economic advancement while preserving the rich local history.

The Thrasher Group North Carolina strives to continue Loray Mill’s legacy of being at the heart of the community by passionately supporting our municipalities and neighborhoods, providing local jobs, and serving the area’s infrastructure needs. 

To learn more, visit:


Read more about Thrasher NC:

Meeting Complex Land Survey Needs for Proposed Lithium Mine Re-Opening

Project Location: Kings Mountain, NC

Site of Albemarle Corporation’s former lithium mine in Kings Mountain

Background:

Kings Mountain, North Carolina, is home to a former lithium mine that has sat dormant for nearly four decades. The site sits atop a deposit that could help meet the growing demand for the lithium needed to support the electric vehicle supply chain and clean energy production in the United States.

Demand for lithium is not driven by the EV market alone. The lithium concentrate that can be derived from the proposed mine is needed to power everything from consumer electronics to life-saving medical devices. There are also national security interests that factor into this potential domestic source of lithium, for example, lithium-ion batteries are used by the U.S. Department of Defense for satellites.   

Overview:

When Albemarle Corporation, a global leader in the specialty chemicals industry, began to explore resuming mining at the Kings Mountain site, it contacted The Thrasher Group North Carolina to help with surveying the original site footprint. The company was pleasantly surprised to find an experienced local contractor with a working knowledge of the community to meet all of its site surveying needs for pre-feasibility studies.

Today, the Albemarle continues to use Thrasher NC’s land surveying services as it prepares for advancing to the permitting process and other necessary pre-construction steps.

Project Goals:

  • Original survey of the 500+ acre legacy parcel and additional surveying services as Albemarle expands the footprint via 100+ parcel acquisitions for buffers zones
  • Identify and highlight improvements, easements, rights-of-way and other important survey information that could impact the feasibility of mining operations
  • Survey the surrounding buffer parcels that Albemarle would need to acquire in order to meet buffer area requirements

Land Surveying Services Provided: 

  • Photogrammetry surveying services
  • Geo-spatial surveying services
  • GNSS/GPS surveying services
  • Conventional surveying services

Training Processes Completed:

  • Completed extensive Mine Safety & Health Administration (MSHA) Training
  • Completed site-specific Albemarle-required training and certification
  • Vetted via 3-month ISNetworld supplier certification process 

Project Approach:

The original land survey of the original footprint was started in 2018. Today, Thrasher NC is in the process of a phased approach with surveying services for additional properties surrounding the original site, anticipating completion of the overall surveying project in 2025.

Project Challenges:

  • Project Size: The entire Kings Mountain site, which also includes a Lithium Conversion Facility and the companies Global Technology Center offices, encompasses >1500 acres. Finding a partner that could keep pace with Albemarle’s need for the original parcel and buffer area acquisition surveying processes was key.
  • Legal & Environmental Communication:  Thrasher NC’s surveying professionals sit in on weekly coordination meetings with attorneys, land agents, and other key project stakeholders to ensure the team is in the loop and available if additional site questions arise.

Project Outcomes:

The Thrasher Group North Carolina has provided Albemarle with all the necessary site surveying services it has needed for the Kings Mountain Lithium Mine in a timely manner.

Since site surveying was a prerequisite for Albemarle to move the project forward through complex pre-feasibility studies, permitting and pre-construction planning, the Thrasher NC team’s timely delivery also allowed Albemarle to stay on track with its own timelines.

There is a water treatment plant on the current parcel, and if needs arise in the future, The Thrasher Group North Carolina can also provide water resources engineering due to its multidisciplinary offerings.


NC DEQ: Water Resources Engineering Grants and Financial Assistance 101

The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) plays a pivotal role in helping communities secure resources to develop robust water infrastructures and prepare for sustainable development. This article outlines two key grant programs offered by the NC DEQ that local governments and councils should not hesitate to take advantage of in 2024.

Additional Support In Applying for NC DEQ Water Resources Programs

Communities should look into resources available to help them apply for water supply and resources grants and assistance. Most grants have been assigned grant managers, responsible for supporting communities in submitting competitive grant applications.

Additionally, if a water supply engineering firm has been contracted to support the project, this resource can often directly support or find a resource to support with the grant writing and application process.

In some cases, such as the 9-Element Plan projects references in #2 below re: Water Quality Management Planning Grant, a special resource will be assigned. For these projects a Division of Water Resources support staff member is assigned to answer questions and advise during the process.

1. Water Resources Development Grant Program – State and Local Projects
The Water Resources Development Grant Program  is a NC DEQ program designed to provide cost-share grants and technical assistance to local governments. The State and Local Projects are those most likely to be applicable across a wider range of communities (vs. programs geared towards Coastal Communities, etc.), so we’ve broken just these State and Local water resources project types, qualifications and application components down below.

Applicable Projects:

  1. Water Management – Stormwater control measures, drainage, flood control, hydrologic restoration, etc.
  2. Water-Based Recreation – Greenways, Trails, Boardwalks; Paddle Access, Fishing Docks/Piers; land acquisition for water-based recreation sites operated by local governments.
  3. Stream Restoration – Restoration or stabilization of degraded streams & shorelines, aquatic barrier removals, etc.
  4. Feasibility / Engineering Studies – Towards implementation of one of the four eligible categories.
  5. Natural Resources Conservation Service Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) – Learn more here.

Eligibility: Units of local government and local political subdivisions. However, projects benefiting underserved communities within a Tier 1 County will be prioritized.

Application Deadlines: Two standard grant application cycles annually for all non-navigation projects. The Spring 2024 application cycle will begin January 2 and ends on June 30, 2024. The Fall application cycle will be announced at a later date and usually runs through the end of the year.

Funding: Applicants are generally encouraged to not exceed a $200,000 funding request, however larger awards may be granted on a case-by-case basis. The suggested limit is $50,000 for engineering/feasibility studies. Administrative costs should not exceed 10% of the total project budget.

Evaluation Criteria: This grant is weighted most heavily on environmental benefits (eg. protect a valuable resource area or enhance environmental resilience) and minimal negative environmental impacts to the project area or adjacent areas. This is followed by projects that will provide the most economic and social benefits to the area. Communities that are underserved or distressed will be prioritized for selection.

  • Economic Benefits (15%)
  • Social Benefits (15%)
  • Environmental Benefits (25%)
  • Environmental Impacts (20%)
  • Regional Benefits (10%)
  • Financial Resources (10%)
  • Benefits to State-Owned Properties (5%)  

Application Components:

  • Contact Information – Applicant information, Board Chairperson Information, Payment Contact, Engineer / Consultant, etc.
  • Project Information – Project Types, with Amount Request, Cost, Geographical Details, etc.
  • Project Narrative – One or two sentence Project Scope summary and brief description of the overall project, a brief description of existing conditions
  • Treatments – Eg. Aquatic Barrier Removal, Stream Crossings, Land Acquisition, etc.
  • Budget Detail – Breakdown by Administration, Design, Permitting, Survey, Materials, Construction Oversight, Monitoring, etc.
Scaled Project Location & Conceptual Plan Maps
Signed Forms – Completed & Signed Official Resolution Form, Completed & Signed Conflict of Interest Certification, Signed & Notarized No Overdue Taxes Form (There are also a number of forms for specific projects and circumstances, detailed on the Application)
  • Reports, Photos, Letters of Support (Optional)

2. Section 205(j) WQ Management Planning Grant

The Section 205(j) Water Quality Management Planning Grant (205(j) references the section of the Clean Water Act where the grants are outlined) is a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-provided grant to states for water quality planning. These projects can include everything from assessments to identify the nature and extent of the water quality issues to planning specific implementation plans to address problems.

Encouraged Projects:

  • EPA 9-Element Watershed Restoration Plans – for a 12-digit or smaller USGS HUC
  • Watershed Assessments of Pollutant Sources – Source identification studies, including water quality monitoring, field assessments, modeling and GIS analyses to support watershed plan development
  • Stormwater Infrastructure Mapping – Water quality planning projects with concrete outputs such as (green and/or gray) stormwater infrastructure mapping
  • Projects that benefit water quality outside of the project area – preferably regionally or statewide
  • Knowledge sharing projects – Projects to share water quality planning knowledge between Councils of Government and their member governments

Eligibility:

Regional Councils of Government. Councils of Government may partner with any public sector organization to implement projects. A financial match is preferred, but not a requirement.

Application Deadlines:

The request for proposals is released annually in summer and projects are selected in fall. If a community plans to apply in 2024, it could be useful to begin planning to submit the application in advance.

Funding:

North Carolina typically receives around $150,000 for competitive funding of water quality planning projects. However, for the 2023 fiscal year, North Carolina received additional funding for $406,000 in total. There is no cap on pass-through funding requests. Applicants are encouraged to request adequate funds to fully execute proposed projects and also to project larger projects.

Evaluation Criteria:

Priority will be given to projects that consider and address environment justice and climate change resilience. Because water quality issues disproportionately affect urban and rural communities of color, indigenous, linguistically isolated, low-income and / or communities impacted by other stressors, the Division of Water Resources will award additional points during evaluation to projects that will benefit historically underserved populations.

Application Components:

  • Project Overview & Abstract
  • Contact & Payment Information, Project Partner Information
  • Statement of Qualifications for Project Manager or Partners
  • Project Area Specifications & Map
  • Project Goals & Types
  • Detailed Project Description
  • Photos or Diagrams (Optional)
  • Bigger Picture Benefits Explanations (Climate Resilience & Benefits to Underserved Communities)
  • Budget Summary (Required) and Match Summary (Optional)

Questions? The Thrasher Group NC can help.

If your community is looking into any of these grants, The Thrasher Group NC can help. Our local team of water system engineers is experienced in water distribution system design, treatment plant design, pump station design, treatment process engineering and other specialties included with the scope of many NC DEQ grants and financial assistance programs.

Thrasher has experience in helping communities apply for and receive assistance, coming alongside Water Boards to educate and prepare communities for growth.

Give us a call at (704) 864-2201 or send us a message using our online contact form . We look forward to speaking with you.